Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I’m not saying that Eric wouldn’t speak to Sami. What I’m getting at is why wasn’t he talking to Will as well, to keep him informed. There was a need for Kate to talk to Austin, but there was no need for Eric to talk to Will, when he did talk to Sami?
I’m not watching Days on Peacock, what I’m getting at is that no one has access to Peacock, given not being tech savvy to watch it & yet they keep bringing up as to what transpired there, leaving people in the dark who had no access to those episodes.
With how EJ was vindicated when it came to Sami’s abduction, they are really going there to have Ava, Johnny, Shin & Wendy to allow EJ to take the rap for Stefan’s state of mind when he was told who was alive for 4 years?
I really hope that Stefan remembers everything & learns for himself as to what Shin had Rolf to do what to him & remembers that EJ had nothing to do with that, now did he?
Johnny needs to remember that Ava & Gabi committed marriage fraud & all he cares about his remarks his father’s made, to me is highly juvenile for Johnny to do, don’t you think?
I don’t: There’s no need for EJ’s nightmare. Because of the fact that look at what transpired some Halloween episodes back when Marlena learned that Tony was in fact, Andre & brainwashed her to kill again & that time she murdered Will, which was a joke, given Marlena’s relationship with him, didn’t stop her did it, do we really need Halloween stories to play out, given as to the content we are seeing lately, it’s too reminiscent of the last season of Dynasty, do they really want the viewers to see the schlock that cancelled Dynasty in the Halloween episodes, with the content that we are seeing now is considered the schlock that cancelled Dynasty & they are allowing two Days actors pontificating Carlivati.
If that’s so, then why was it needed for Brady to lie about speaking to Paul. The last time he was seen was on Beyond Salem 2, so why was there a need for him to lie about his brother?
Then, bringing up Sami that Eric was speaking to, if Sweeney isn’t returning, or is she, if it turns out that she isn’t but yet a necessity to bring up as to who he was speaking to?
With how it was needed for Brady to lie about Paul & Eric bringing up speaking to Sami, don’t you think it should have been seen for someone to be talking to Will, given his relationship with Marlena, so why wasn’t it?
I may not know who had seen Beyond Salem 2 or hadn’t seen it, but it was a necessity to bring up as to what Steve had went through on BS2, which was brought up by Kayla, referring to when all the of them were together?
The last two episodes to wrap up Queen Sugar’s season 7 that ends the series, has Greg Vaughan returning, because Eric gets a very surprising job offer involving his previous profession. Look at the October 24th issue of Soap Opera Digest.
Isn’t it very odd that they gave Ava the story to never return to Salem, meaning, the exposure of Gabi’s forging of Jake’s name on his marriage license & yet, the bring her back to bring EJ down to explain her leaving again?
Rafe may not have been married when he slept with Kate & Carrie, but he did cheat on Hope with Sami, but he calls this out on Nicole?
Kurth may not have a contract with DOOL, but still explain where he went to, explain as to where Bonnie went, explain as to where Sonny went to. They have been mentioning where other characters had went it, meaning, Jennifer, Mike, Craig, but they don’t explain as where other characters went?
Especially when Queen Sugar is ending in November, so with it ending in November, Vaughan leaves Days for the O Network show & yet again, Eric puts his newest job offer ahead of his newest love interest, JADA, Which he had done the same thing with Nicole?
Why is it with Paulina facing of what her daughter had done, they refuse to allow Paulina, Stephanie & Chad to be seen to stop Sloan & that person that had given her that file on what Chanel had done?
Then, they refuse to play up Alex, Sonny & Titan when their business is funding the Gubernatorial run & they are oblivious to what Paulina is facing from Sloan.
Then this: With Ava, Johnny & Wendy: They think the viewers need to see two brothers vying for Wendy, when the story calls for Wei to learn as to what his
son had done to Stefan’s brain, & if it comes out as to what Shin did with
Stefan’s brain, that Ava & Johnny plan to take it out on EJ, when he had
no clue as to what Shin had one to Stefan’s brain & that no one forced Ava
to do what she had done & they think that EJ has to be blamed for it ???WTFEspecially when they had put it out there of Braun’s dismissal, they had to bring her back???WTF
Isn’t a little conflict of interest, given that Stephanie’s HR firm had taken Chad on as an employee, yet they make out, get drunk & then were about to go to bed with each other, it may not have happened, but still, they were going there & also because Stephanie’s HR firm is apart of Titan, given as to who’s funding the Gubenatorial run is Titan, in which Alex is the Interim CEO of & yet, someone approves of Alex calling Stephanie out on it, given Alex’s feelings towards Stephanie?
When Rebecca Budig was on GH as Hayden Barnes, she crippled a character that her ex-husband was blackmailing her on, but, she was playing Greenlee Smythe on AMC way before the character of Hayden Barnes was created for GH, the same here. Meaning, Chanel wasn’t even an idea to create & we are suppose to believe what she had done in College, she actually did, given as to what Will went through with Adrienne, it turned out that it was Evan & Orpheus who had done it. Think about it, it’s the same story when Jake was on at the time that they had Abe’s shooting, it turned out that Jake never killed anyone in Philly & we are suppose to believe that Chanel did this?
Then with Alex being the interim CEO at Titan, & that he participated in a threesome with Allie & Chanel, wouldn’t what Chanel had supposedly had done in College destroy Titan, given that it would be a scandal for Titan because as to she had slept with was the CEO of Titan?
Couple of folds: Yes, Stephanie has her own PR firm, & yes, she was hired by Titan to do their PR, & she was hired by Paulina to run her campaign & yes, Steph may have hired Chad, but with Stephanie being an “employee” at Titan, should she fall for Chad given that with her being an employee at Titan & that Chad was hired by her own firm, meaning, that her own firm & Titan are competitors, therefore, a conflict of interest, don’t you think?
This goes to Sloan. What makes anyone think what Chanel had done in college was actually done by her, given that once again that there’s no story at all as to how Sloan got wind of Chanel’s college antics & given where it supposedly took place would hardly be relevant in Salem, now would it, given that it would destroy Paulina’s Gubernatorial run of her last place of residence, remember, anyone who is campaigning for any political office, would take place in there last place of residence, not where she isn’t a resident of, meaning, marrying into the state that isn’t her last place residence.
With how Alex is interim CEO of Titan & what Chanel had supposedly done in College, would cause a scandal to Titan & then if it comes out when it comes to the three-some with Allie & Chanel, it would be another scandal to Titan, because as to who was one of the parties in the three-some & her college antics would have two scandals involving Titan, & then a third scandal, given the parties involved in the campaign would be guilty of conspiracy & you tell me was the three-some needed?
Chad was never hired by Titan, all he did was lend a helping hand. But still, look as to what Chad did with Kate, Leo, Ted & Vivian. He allowed the lawsuit against Sonny to take place, meaning, the sexual harassment against Sonny. Once Chad & Stephanie learns from Paulina as to what Sloan has on Chanel, & they put into motion to cover it up would be disastrous to Titan because of the conspiracy. Then there’s this with Alex & Ambiguous Bi-Couple, meaning, the threesome, let’s hope it doesn’t go there, but if does, Alex would bring a sex scandal once again to Titan, & then if the threesome does happen, Sloan would end up getting the video of the threesome & what she has on Chanel & gives to the Salem Spectator, can you imagine the fall-out of that?
I can’t see many deaths happen to the rest of the characters, because this show is hanging on for dear life, would there even be a show, given the backlash would have if they kill off Kate, Kayla & Marlena. HEAVEN FORBID, as to what would happen if they kill off these characters.
So the question that I have. With how he had brought up firing Stephanie is the wrong move on many levels, that he’s willing to throw a sex scandal to topple the family business & allowing his brother to take the fall, given that one of them is the Interim CEO & the other is the CEO. Then this will also allow Sloan to take photos, or as well have a video of the threesome to be shown in order to end Paulina’s Gubernatorial run, given as to what she has on Chanel. One, the sex scandal video & then sending what she has to the Salem Spectator as to what she has on Chanel. Knowing this show they will never show as to how Sloan knows as to what Chanel has allegedly to have done & that would also diminish the viewership of this show, no matter as to how they are able to see this schlock.
The other question relates to Alex. & as well to Chad & Stephanie. 2 seconds after Abby left Chad at the cemetary, dis dam bang, he had no qualms at all over hand-holding with Stephanie & that is what Alex walked in on, once he saw hand-holding, boom, he made a bee-line to Allie & Chanel’s door-step, hinting the threesome being in play, when he had already had told his brother that firing Stephanie is out of line, but he doesn’t see as to what the threesome would cause to Titan, given that he’s the interim CEO at Titan, yes, granted Allie & Chanel are not employees at Titan, but still, there would be a sex scandal involving the interim CEO, given as to what transpired between, Leo & Sonny. So, the question is why Alex is so willing to cause another sex scandal that would cripple Titan, given as to what position he has with Titan, was where his brother was when it came to Leo. I know that Allie & Chanel are not employees, but still, his position with Titan would put him in the position to get fired, because as to who Allie is to Sonny. With how Massey is on retainer, meaning, coming & going, can you imagine what he would to his brother-in-law once he learns of the threesome involving Alex & his sister. Talk about going ballistic, don’t you think?
The question that I have is this: I get that Chanel is fiery & bubbly & filled with effervescence, but still, she doesn’t need to be involved in a three-way just to prove it to Allie. I hope that Chanel leaves Allie cold & alone, because to Chanel, she sees that Allie is in a way acting like Will, some time ago, he had put it out there that after he married Sonny & that he had gotten that L.A. job offer, he had said that he doesn’t want to have a boring life in Salem. That’s exactly what Allie is saying to Chanel, she sees her life with Chanel boring, she doesn’t want the life with Chanel that Will has with Sonny, she keeps making it about herself & wanting Chanel to stay with her & will do anything to make that happen. She’s trying to breathe life in a relationship that’s failing. So the question that I have is this: This is the main problem with the bi-sexual lifestyle they don’t want a stable life with anyone, they think that it’s a-okay to cheat on whoever they are with because they don’t want stability. So is it so wise to play that up on here?
Allie is a dour sourpuss, there’s nothing in her that anyone wants to see. So why is she needed?
The question that I have is why the need for closure when it came to Leo & Craig & Nancy & Mike. What I mean is that with what went down with the Wesleys & Mike is over & done with & how long Mike has been gone for & how very little as to what he knows now, you tell me, does it matter now, when it comes to Nancy & Mike, given that Mike isn’t staying & the same with Leo & Craig. Don’t you think that there should be closure between Leo & Chad & as well with Leo & Sonny, yes, granted it’s known as to what Clyde had done, but still, look as to what Leo had done to Sonny with the harassment charges & the attempted murder charges & the content sent to Will, there’s no hashing that out with Sonny, now is there & they do this with Craig & Leo & Nancy & Mike given what went down with the 4 of them is over & done with?
With how long Weiss hasn’t been seen acting wise, how would he be too expensive?. I know that the last time Mike was seen on camera was when Roark played the role, but should it negate Weiss’s Mike?
I understand that the reason Roark’s Mike is back to hash things out with Nancy, but what I’m getting at is that isn’t it futile for them to hash things out now, given, that all the Wesleys did to him then, that he too is blame, once he hadn’t been shagging that upcoming nurse back then, would she have been talked into by Craig to file the charges, given that Mike didn’t even know that nurse was on the list of new hirees, then with how Mike & Jennifer are leaving this week & so is Craig, why waste with dead air by hashing anything out, given that it’s over & done with, especially, with Mike doesn’t even know about the damage that Clyde did to Nancy is there a need to crush her even more with what she did when is over & done with?
Don’t you think that it’s very odd that Clyde has alluded to Alex as his sonny-boy, in his Deliverance lingo, given that RSW had played his son, & then bringing up that after Sonny was stabbed, that he was found in his office & then that it was played up about Alex bringing up the question to Sonny, ” Are you serious “, given that Stephanie is an employee at Titan & that Alex is Interim CEO at Titan. Do you really think that there is going to be a murder mystery over Clyde’s murder, given whoever had done it would be pontificated for it & given the key to the city, so wouldn’t you think that it would be considered waste of dead air, given Clyde’s actions lately?
This goes to Jada Hunter & Sarah Horton. When Sarah had brought up that she attended Jada’s 8th birthday party. Marcus Hunter, Jada’s dad left town in 1992. The writers now, when Jada showed herself to Kayla & Steve, the both of them brought up that they were saddened over Marcus’ death. MAJOR GOOF: The character never died, only the actor, Richard Biggs did, don’t you think that it’s very odd that the writers have the characters reference to the actor’s death, when the character left town 30 years ago & waited 30 years later to put it out there of the character’s death?
It’s also odd that not once did any member of Marcus’ family contacted anyone in order for anyone to know of Marcus’ daughter, don’t you think?
