Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
This is what Leo would lose if Will sets him up, it would be one blackmail vs. another. It will allow Will to use what he set up on Leo to get Leo to get rid of what he has on Sonny. With the news of Marcie Miller’s leaving, I have a feeling that who kills Leo would be Abigail & she goes to prison for murder, remember as to what Leo had done with the spectator by planting Chad’s secret drag life. This would be the story to let Marcie leave.
This is two-fold: On this show’s soapsheknows messageboard, the new recast for Stephanie ends up killing Abigail.
How does that work, MM’s Abby is apart of Beyond Salem 2, now is she & then there’s this, with Abigail being one of the suspects in Leo’s murder, given what Leo gave the Spectator about Chad’s secret drag life puts Abby on the list of suspects, so you tell how they will still put in motion for Abigail’s death?
This is about Leo, Sonny & Will: I remember some time back, a verbal smack down involving Brady & Sonny, they were going back & forth, as in a volley of venom spewing between the both of them. When Nicole ended up in that food fight with Sami, it was shear magnificance all the way & yet, we are seeing none of that, now are we?
What I’m getting at is this, With this story is this, Leo knew that Sonny was out cold, he was the one who poisoned the cookies, he was the one that carried Sonny to his bed, stripped him & then created the perception to destroy Sonny. What I’m getting at is how does it show perception with Sonny out cold? Also, isn’t it very odd that the Sonny would be allowing Leo to do this by eating the cookies?
Sonny even let Victor know of Leo’s vengeance & yet, he’s willing to allow Leo’s vengeance by going along with it, hence eating the cookies.
The only way I can see Sonny getting out of this is by having Will convincing Sonny to allow him to seduce Leo & set it up to give the perception of that & use that as blackmail on Leo, matching blackmail with blackmail.
I hope that they play up Will believing this coming from Sonny. It gives Sonny a taste of his own medicine. That way when they throw-away Massey’s Will again. They will play up who killed Leo Stark. The suspects will be Craig, Nancy, Brady, Chloe, Clyde, Sonny.
What I don’t get is why Sonny would allow Leo to do this. Remember, the actors put in the work, learning the scripts, blocking them, taping them, what they are doing here is showing that the characters are playing the actors, meaning, the characters allowing it, when the actors are the ones who put in the work. I can’t see the characters allowing all of this when the characters aren’t the actors, it’s up to the actors who are willing to do what’s written. The characters are fictional people played brilliantly by the actors, so why show the characters are willing when the actors are the ones that are willing to do what’s written.
No one is going to by this yet again, with how many people now know what Leo did when, they’re going to believe it again, knowing who’s behind this?, so how exactly is this going to work on Sonny yet again, give how all of Salem knows what Leo did once before?
Then this: Without Leo marrying a drag queen, no one would have flown the drag queen anywhere for anyone to provoke who in order for who’s vengeance to put all of this in motion & they think that it’s wise to play up who provoked who into what started this?
My thoughts exactly, given as to how they have put out there many suspects, Nancy, Clyde, Sonny, Chad, Brady, Chloe, Craig. They wouldn’t be playing up these people if they are going to kill off Abigail, now would they?
I have read on this show’s soapsheknows message board, that Leo is going to make it look like that Sonny cheated on Will. Where did that come from, when Will was in prison for Adrienne’s death, he forgave Sonny for having relations with Evan, so why have Leo playing up having Will think that Sonny cheated on him, given that Will had forgiven Sonny for his romance with Evan?
Plus, I have read that someone takes Sonny to the hospital in Friday’s episode & Sonny tries to piece it together what happened the previous night, would hardly have Leo give the illusion of Sonny’s infidelities, now would he?
May 24 2002 Episode
With Victor learning of Leo’s vengeaence on Sonny. With Clyde now knowing of Nancy’s altercation with Leo, & Nancy knowing her daughter is on the chopping block from Leo, himself & when Sonny learns the hard way that Leo had poisoned him. The question that I have is this, are they really playing up killing Abigail, given what I brought up here is the making of Who Killed Leo Stark, with the actions of Leo’s from this date’s episode?
Yet again, they play up the character playing the actor. The actor in question is Greg Rikaart. The actor knows very well about the gift that Will & Ari had sent to Tinker’s Sonny in order for him to poison the cookies that Sonny thinks came from Will & Ari, but explain how the CHARACTER of Leo Stark knew as to what was sent to Sonny?
The Issue of Soap Opera Digest that was dated May 30 2022, that I had gotten last week, only put out there of Sonny’s advice to Xander, & that Friday’s episode, Sonny ending up in the hospital trying to piece together as to what happened. Explain as to why the issue never put out there of Sonny’s poisoning & only about the advice to Xander & ending up in the hospital?
So the question that I have is this: With the devastation that Leo had caused him, that Will had shown to Chad, before they threw Will away, why is he so willing to turn into Leo by resorting Leo’s actions?
Especially when it was shown in Beyond Salem of how he reacted when he thought Will had been cheating on him with Leo & that he had let Chad see the devastation in him when he believed that Will was cheating again.
What really bothers me about this, meaning, with what I’m bringing up was caused by Leo by marrying Jackie Cox & there’s no fault on him at all, given who he married had allowed Chad to fly who where.
This is two-fold: With how Gabi has been rehired at DeMira as CEO, & that EJ & Chad are defeated, they bring up destroying Gabi & bringing the company back to them, then why tank it & lose their business altogether by having EJ sexing up Belle?
So explain as to why it’s justified & the main crux of the whole story of him taking it out on the messengers who brought the said husband to the double ceremony?
This is what find extremely abhorrent & repugnant. Sonny had once told Melanie that being gay doesn’t define him, so explain as to why he’s so willing to denigrate his own lifestyle by allowing Chad using the lifestyle, criminally?
To me, what I find is that Sonny is mentally unsound & all because of what Evan & Leo had done him to the point that he allows himself to denigrate his own lifestyle to allow Chad to use it as a weapon on Leo, it shows that Sonny is loving turning into Leo Stark Kiriakis by resorting to Leo’s actions.
My question is why Leo is so willing to exact vengeance on Brady, Chloe, Chad & Sonny.
Think about it: It’s exactly what they had played up with the sexual harassment charges.
Meaning, why should it matter when it comes to the content of the photos & who were in the photos, remember, without the entrapment, they wouldn’t have gotten the photos or the content of the photos, now would they? Same here, this is all Leo’s fault & his fault alone, he’s the one that married Darius Rose, so why take it out on the messengers, meaning who flew who where?
I get that he took his mother’s maiden name & I get that at the time when he showed up that his name is Xander Cook, but why, negate his father’s ancestry. I can see that the character of Xander wants to honor his mother, but it plays up the actor’s ancestry, but it also plays up that the character is negating his father’s ancestry in the show, does it not?
This pertains to the episode that was on May 19, 2002:
A couple of folds: TR may not have had a weapon, meaning any weaponry, but he was using his hand as a weapon, did he not, so why not play up that his hand was used as a weapon on Paulina to justify the shooting, that’s fold number 1.
Fold number 2: With how Sarah managed to forgive Xander for what he done the first time around, why can’t she forgive him this time around. Think about it: This opens it up for him to forgive Gwen, & it also opens it up for her & Leo to band together to destroy Salem that they had put a stop to when Paulina tried to do that, right ?
Fold number 3: Yes, Leo now knows that Sonny has been reinstated as CEO of Titan again, but Victor & Sonny don’t know that Leo now knows about it, but they did have Sonny letting Victor knowing about Leo’s vengeance plot. Sonny did tell Victor that Will & Ari are coming home because they miss Salem, but what I’m getting at is that this would be Brady & Sonny’s fault if Leo & Gwen destroy Salem, because it was Brady who tipped Sonny off about Jackie, that led to Chad fly Jackie to town to stop Leo’s wedding to Craig. is it so wise to allow Leo to do more damage to Sonny & have him villified, given what Leo’s actions did to him that Will had shown to Chad ?
But remember, look at how Jake was with Ava, when Ava & Steve believed that their son was dead. Jake was loving, tender, caring, being there for Ava, & when Jake had scenes with Ben & Ciara, the three of them hugged each other & Jake seeing Ben’s son Baby Bo. Do you really think that if they had kept Tripp dead that there would be another triangle with Ava, Kayla & Steve ?
This pertains to the May 18, 2022 episode. Can anyone explain as to why they kept playing up Paul Telfer’s ancestry. Paul Telfer is an actor. He plays the role of Xander Kiriakis, Xander is of Greek descent, so why play up the actor’s Scottish ancestry?
The question that I have is with how they had 1 possession, 2 possession, 3 possession, 4 possession, 5, possession 6, possession 7, possession 8, possession 9.
Meaning: Marlena, Doug, Marlena, Johnny, Jake, Belle, Marlena, Allie, Tripp.
Then they play up rising Charlie up from the dead, then releasing Evan, & having the both of them on cloud nine in sacrificing a baby.
Don’t you think it’s waaaay tooooooooooooooo excessive for Daytime?
I get as to why Tripp was saved by Bo, because LA has agreed to play Tripp for Beyond Salem 2, but to me, they needed to keep him dead, given that fact that Tripp Dalton isn’t exactly Will Horton, don’t you think?
What I mean is that there wouldn’t have been massive backlash over Tripp’s death the way there was when it came to Will’s death, now was there.
2 months later all the people of Salem would say Tripp who.
The first installment of Beyond Salem was filled faults.
Fault 1: Protecting a source’s anonymity, the husband believes his spouse is cheating on him, so should they stay married, because look what the spouse would think if his spouse does it again?
Fault 2: No soap format: Brand New Alamains, no story to explain them is number 1, number 2 is that other Alamain has a thicker accent than the other one, that character with the thicker accent shows that he knew of his cousins by way of the actor’s script & no story to explain the character in knowing, & number 3 is Darius’ Jackie, giving the illusion that Lisa Rinna’s Billie is the actress. Number 4 is every 5 seconds they keep playing up the network that they are on, hence the Alamain Peacock.
Fault 3: This pertains to the Christmas film, when Tink, Massey’s Will & Sonny was in drag at the denouement of the Samta Stripping when there was no story for it, now was there?
with ADAMS, Banus, Evans, Hall, Remington, Hogestyn, Konafel, Nichols, Scott Wilson, with Lucas Adams being a part of BS2, it’s wise to murder Tripp off on the NBC soap & expect him to be alive to be apart of BS2 or are they going to have Reckell’s Bo reversing Tripp’s death?
The next question is this: I can see that Ciara manages to rescue her child, but what I’m getting at is that this child is also Ben’s as well, what I’m getting at is that with when Eve & Vincent tried to brainwash him into killing his new wife then, & he never went through with it at all, that Satan would have a problem with him saving his child & that Satan would be willing to relinquish the child to the boy’s mother?
TALK ABOUT HOWARD THE DUCK WRITING, DON’T YOU THINK?
What I’m getting at is that with how they have played up one possession, 2 possession 3 & then play up playing the Child’s Play film franchise, meaning, Allie corrupting Baby Bo’s soul & the Poltergeist film series, meaning, Diane Freeling going to the other side to bring her daughter back, given Ciara crossing over to get her child back, then play up, 1 possession, 2, possession 3, possession 4, when he inhabits Tripp, & forcing him to kill Allie & he ends up sacrificing himself instead of doing away with her, would have Ava arrested for murdering Allie, all because the writers think that they needed to revisit Marlena’s possession, then her grandson & then her granddaughter & have Ava killing Allie because Tripp sacrificed himself so Allie would be safe, I certainly wouldn’t willing to face Ava once she buries her first born, don’t you think & then putting into play of the Salem Stalker, given that they had played it up twice, for when Marlena had sent people to Maleswen & when Andre ended up being the Salem Stalker as well, once again, do we need to end up in another loop, one Salem Stalker, 2 Salem Stalker 3?
