- This topic has 23 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I am not demanding anything. With how Sonny had brought up Leo’s vengeance against Sonny to Victor & said yes to the CEO position & agrees to be the CEO again, & with how Leo just had gotten wind of it, why allow him anywhere near Titan, given as to what Leo had done to it once before, with Victor bringing it up?
Or is there a chance that with how it didn’t go anywhere given as to what Leo had posted about Chad’s secret drag life, does this mean that it won’t go anywhere if he tries to go after Titan again?
The reason as to why I brought this up, is all because of Sonny’s plan to have Chad to seduce Leo, would put into motion of Abigail’s killing & what would that do to Sonny, think about it, CEO Arrested For Conspiracy to DeMira Killing & all because the writers put into motion for Abigail’s killing & allowing Tinker’s Sonny agreeing to be CEO again.
Do we know for sure that Abigail is going to be killed off? I heard she was still taping shows. That said, I did hear there was going to be a return of the Salem Stalker storyline. Do you think Leo will be the Salem Stalker, but he’ll be setting up Sonny as part of his revenge?
Can you really see them playing up the Salem Stalker Storyline this time around due to the backlash of Satan in Allie & allowing her do her version of the Movie Child’s Play, given the backlash that they had gotten once before when it came to Will’s murder?, Especially given how vocal Hall had been in having the possession of Allie taking this long?
I can’t see that they would play up The Salem Stalker story again, given, the fact that it was Andre who was the first Salem Stalker & how they had Marlena being Stefanos’ Mistress of the Night & having her kill off Salemites that resulted in the show’s Howard The Duck move, known as Melaswen?
I actually heard that they are going to do the Salem Stalker again. And yes they had backlash from old school days fans when they brought Satan back, but supposedly they gained a bunch of new viewers. So now they want to bring back the stalker storyline in hopes of gaining new viewers again. They think the grass is greener on the other side. The new viewers don’t stick around. It’s the long time viewers they should be trying to save.
What I’m getting at is that with how they have played up one possession, 2 possession 3 & then play up playing the Child’s Play film franchise, meaning, Allie corrupting Baby Bo’s soul & the Poltergeist film series, meaning, Diane Freeling going to the other side to bring her daughter back, given Ciara crossing over to get her child back, then play up, 1 possession, 2, possession 3, possession 4, when he inhabits Tripp, & forcing him to kill Allie & he ends up sacrificing himself instead of doing away with her, would have Ava arrested for murdering Allie, all because the writers think that they needed to revisit Marlena’s possession, then her grandson & then her granddaughter & have Ava killing Allie because Tripp sacrificed himself so Allie would be safe, I certainly wouldn’t willing to face Ava once she buries her first born, don’t you think & then putting into play of the Salem Stalker, given that they had played it up twice, for when Marlena had sent people to Maleswen & when Andre ended up being the Salem Stalker as well, once again, do we need to end up in another loop, one Salem Stalker, 2 Salem Stalker 3?
I don’t think we need to revisit any of these storylines, but apparently Ron Carlivati is short on original ideas, so he’s doing it. I can’t even believe that Corday would allow this crap on screen. It’s ridiculous, unoriginal, and boring. I guess I’ll be using the fast forward button on my remote even more.
The next question is this: I can see that Ciara manages to rescue her child, but what I’m getting at is that this child is also Ben’s as well, what I’m getting at is that with when Eve & Vincent tried to brainwash him into killing his new wife then, & he never went through with it at all, that Satan would have a problem with him saving his child & that Satan would be willing to relinquish the child to the boy’s mother?
TALK ABOUT HOWARD THE DUCK WRITING, DON’T YOU THINK?
The first installment of Beyond Salem was filled faults.
Fault 1: Protecting a source’s anonymity, the husband believes his spouse is cheating on him, so should they stay married, because look what the spouse would think if his spouse does it again?
Fault 2: No soap format: Brand New Alamains, no story to explain them is number 1, number 2 is that other Alamain has a thicker accent than the other one, that character with the thicker accent shows that he knew of his cousins by way of the actor’s script & no story to explain the character in knowing, & number 3 is Darius’ Jackie, giving the illusion that Lisa Rinna’s Billie is the actress. Number 4 is every 5 seconds they keep playing up the network that they are on, hence the Alamain Peacock.
Fault 3: This pertains to the Christmas film, when Tink, Massey’s Will & Sonny was in drag at the denouement of the Samta Stripping when there was no story for it, now was there?
with ADAMS, Banus, Evans, Hall, Remington, Hogestyn, Konafel, Nichols, Scott Wilson, with Lucas Adams being a part of BS2, it’s wise to murder Tripp off on the NBC soap & expect him to be alive to be apart of BS2 or are they going to have Reckell’s Bo reversing Tripp’s death?
The question that I have is with how they had 1 possession, 2 possession, 3 possession, 4 possession, 5, possession 6, possession 7, possession 8, possession 9.
Meaning: Marlena, Doug, Marlena, Johnny, Jake, Belle, Marlena, Allie, Tripp.
Then they play up rising Charlie up from the dead, then releasing Evan, & having the both of them on cloud nine in sacrificing a baby.
Don’t you think it’s waaaay tooooooooooooooo excessive for Daytime?
I get as to why Tripp was saved by Bo, because LA has agreed to play Tripp for Beyond Salem 2, but to me, they needed to keep him dead, given that fact that Tripp Dalton isn’t exactly Will Horton, don’t you think?
What I mean is that there wouldn’t have been massive backlash over Tripp’s death the way there was when it came to Will’s death, now was there.
2 months later all the people of Salem would say Tripp who.
I would have been upset if Tripp died. Kill off Allie, she’s boring and fickle. Pretty useless to me. Plus I want Johnny and Chanel together so she’d be out of the way. Also, I would not want to live through another Ava, Steve, and Kayla triangle, which is what would happen if Tripp died. Ava would be leaning on Steve all the time and then we’d have to see her try to steal Steve again.
But remember, look at how Jake was with Ava, when Ava & Steve believed that their son was dead. Jake was loving, tender, caring, being there for Ava, & when Jake had scenes with Ben & Ciara, the three of them hugged each other & Jake seeing Ben’s son Baby Bo. Do you really think that if they had kept Tripp dead that there would be another triangle with Ava, Kayla & Steve ?
This pertains to the May 18, 2022 episode. Can anyone explain as to why they kept playing up Paul Telfer’s ancestry. Paul Telfer is an actor. He plays the role of Xander Kiriakis, Xander is of Greek descent, so why play up the actor’s Scottish ancestry?
Xander’s mother is Scottish. Remember he took her maiden name as his surname when he came to Salem. He was Xander Cook.
I get that he took his mother’s maiden name & I get that at the time when he showed up that his name is Xander Cook, but why, negate his father’s ancestry. I can see that the character of Xander wants to honor his mother, but it plays up the actor’s ancestry, but it also plays up that the character is negating his father’s ancestry in the show, does it not?
This pertains to the episode that was on May 19, 2002:
A couple of folds: TR may not have had a weapon, meaning any weaponry, but he was using his hand as a weapon, did he not, so why not play up that his hand was used as a weapon on Paulina to justify the shooting, that’s fold number 1.
Fold number 2: With how Sarah managed to forgive Xander for what he done the first time around, why can’t she forgive him this time around. Think about it: This opens it up for him to forgive Gwen, & it also opens it up for her & Leo to band together to destroy Salem that they had put a stop to when Paulina tried to do that, right ?
Fold number 3: Yes, Leo now knows that Sonny has been reinstated as CEO of Titan again, but Victor & Sonny don’t know that Leo now knows about it, but they did have Sonny letting Victor knowing about Leo’s vengeance plot. Sonny did tell Victor that Will & Ari are coming home because they miss Salem, but what I’m getting at is that this would be Brady & Sonny’s fault if Leo & Gwen destroy Salem, because it was Brady who tipped Sonny off about Jackie, that led to Chad fly Jackie to town to stop Leo’s wedding to Craig. is it so wise to allow Leo to do more damage to Sonny & have him villified, given what Leo’s actions did to him that Will had shown to Chad ?
I totally don’t understand this cover-up of TR’s shooting. You’re right, he had his hand raised at Paulina. He was going to hit her, he had already attacked Abe who was lying in a pool of blood. It would be justified that Lani reacted by shooting TR. Instead they’re going to drag out this insane story. I’m just glad that Lani to Eli that she shot him.
As for Sarah and Xander, nothing is easy on Days. She will forgive him again. I’m just glad someone told her that Mickey is dead. I was wondering how long that farce would go on. I’m just sad that it was Eric instead of Xander.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.