Xandy’s Innocence

But what proof. That proof is useless now, now isn’t it, given that no one knows that Harris’ shooter is behind bars & Harris has been silent as a Charlie Chaplin movie, so you tell me why the story of proving that Xandy was framed when it’s useless, because the damage has been done. Just like when Sonny was accused of sexual harassment, he was never vindicated because it was never made public, now was it?

The proof is useless, he can’t clear his name at all, because he illegally went through all of the stuff that Justin had stolen from the prosecution to give Xander for him to go illegally through & then had illegally went through the footage to show to Rafe. The case is closed because the shooter is in prison, & that all the parties involved know that Stefan is in prison & with Harris being as silent as Charlie Chaplin movie, & Stefan in prison, they leave the case open for Xander to find an illegal loophole. Sonny may no longer be there anymore, but still, he would never be free with what Leo put him through because it was never disclosed the public, now was it.

Actually, to the best of my knowledge, the prosecution has no right to give the defense everything he’s going to use or to have it to be known as exculpatory evidence, because he allows the opposing counsel to poke holes in it & using those holes to get his client, off & what prosecution would allow that, being willing to throw his own case by giving the holes to the defense?

You are using the real-life legal system to justify what goes on in fiction???WTF You find me any fictional non-shown legal counsel to throw the case & present holes to the opposition, i.e. the defense team or lawyer for the defense? Think about it. If I played a lawyer in a soap & I’m the prosecutor, I’m allowed to hand over holes in my evidence to the defense to get his & or her client off, given that he or she used nefarious ways to get out of it, especially given that person that committed the crime, had no description at all, much less knowledge as to what the suspect was wearing to buy an extremely priced knock-off to frame the suspect who had no motive at all to act on the crime at hand. Remember, the gun that was found, was it ever proven that Xander touched it, or used it, no, all they did was to show where it was found. When Sami was a suspect in Charlie’s murder, she & Rafe proved that she was still in flight at the time of Charlie’s murder, why couldn’t they not show that Xander’s prints weren’t on the weapon, or know it was found until it was shown to him in the interrogation room.

My version is the law in the soap universe. I know that it doesn’t happen in reality. It wasn’t shown or mentioned as to how Justin had gotten the exculpatory evidence, it wouldn’t be the first time that Justin did something underhanded, remember, the judge that tried to have his way with Gwen, that was when Bonnie & Xander were still prison, both of them got roommates, Xandy had gotten Justin & Bonnie had gotten Gwen, when her recording of a judge sexually harassing her was used by Justin to blackmail the judge with, but that’s just an example. Then, let’s say I’m an actor & I play a lawyer on soap, no less, there is no way would I ever hand over holes to the defense lawyer & use those holes to get his client off, now would I? They could have easily have played up did Xander use the gun, did he handle it, no they had to charge all because of what was found. That’s what I mean.

But would Xander, given that he no clue until he saw it brought in & it was shown to him, remember, Sarah saw the text that came in while he was running showing that he never had his phone when he went running, so with him not having his phone during his running, that makes him the shooter, given that he never had his phone when, how-come that doesn’t show any red-flags. In order for him to do the shooting, he had to have it on him & did he?

Yes, I get that Clyde & Stefan set Xander up, but there’s no motive, Xander has no reason to shoot Harris, Harris knows who shot him, & he’s staying silent as a Charlie Chaplin movie, then, they failed to prove that the weapon was used by Xander, doesn’t even has his prints, all they showed was the weapon was in his home, but did Xander have it when he went running, NO. Then the text that Sarah had seen that came in while Xander was running, hence, showing that he didn’t even have his phone went when he went running, now did he? So you tell me how the narrative did not come from the minds of the writing team of Howard The Duck?