- This topic has 8 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 4 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
With what Shin had laid on his sister. With what EJ had laid on his son. Yes, Stefan has every right to know of it. Think about it this way, with all of the parties involved: EJ, Johnny, Shin & Wendy, with all of them knowing of what Rolf had done to Stefan, the more they keep it quiet, let’s say it comes out & with all knowing & keeping it quiet, wouldn’t all four go to prison just because the story was in place for Johnny & Wendy knowing about it, which makes them complicit with it?
So should this story have been played out?
Prison is a stretch. There’s no real crime, either. Rolf is nowhere to be seen, and he’s the one who committed “the crime.” The police would never come after any of them for what happened unless the DA was hot to file charges against them. Can you really see Stefan running to the police and the DA and saying please file charges against these people because they knew I had been brainwashed by Rolf? That’s a ridiculous premise. This is the Dimeras, they’ll keep it all in the family where revenge is better than going to prison.
Then explain the arrest of Paulina. There was no crime because of she & the school scrapped everything, so wouldn’t the conspiracy charges be dropped, because remember, Chad & Stephanie signed the NDAs & that Alex stole the file & Leo allowed Sloane to steal the file. So wouldn’t the conspiracy charges be dropped because Sloane is using stolen property to make sure that charges of conspiracy put Paulina’s arrest into play?
Well to be honest, Chanel should not have been arrested therefore Paulina shouldn’t be either. I think we’ve already discussed the fact that Sloane’s mother’s death was an accident. It was an accident that never would have happened had she not been plotting to kill Chanel. And I’m confused as to why Paulina would even be arrested. I thought Sloane’s dad made the plan that his wife’s death would be listed as a suicide to protect his children. And to be completely honest, this is NOT a concern of the Salem PD. The crime, which is no crime, occurred in England, not Salem.
The question is this: With Sloane’s mother’s death being ruled a suicide which was put out by Sloane’s father on his deathbed. You tell me why should it should matter as to who covered it up then & how many people are involved with the cover-up now, so you tell me why is there a need for this story?
There isn’t a need. Sloane serves no purpose on this show at this point, except to be involved in this ridiculous storyline. If they had planned to keep Sloane on the show, I would rather they had paired her with Alex and watch them become a power couple in Salem. Instead, Sloane is not a great actress and she’s in a storyline no one cares about. Alex is chasing after Stephanie and I’m just not seeing the same kind of chemistry with them that he had when he was Ben with Ciera.
So if there isn’t a need & Sloane has no purpose on this show at this point, explain as to why allow Sloane running roughshod over people?, especially given that the conspiracy doesn’t hold water, because of the statute of limitations on conspiracy, would nullify Paulina’s arrest & they aren’t even putting it into motion at all to get rid of this story now is there?
So if there isn’t a need & Sloane has no purpose on this show at this point, explain as to why allow Sloane running roughshod over people?, especially given that the conspiracy doesn’t hold water, because of the statute of limitations on conspiracy, would nullify Paulina’s arrest & they aren’t even putting it into motion at all to get rid of this story now is there?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.