- This topic has 13 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by
.
-
Posts
-
This has to be addressed ASAP: What I’m getting at is this: This is hypothetical. Let’s say that EJ did agree to help Stefan to get rid of Clyde & it backfired on the both of them & they both ended up in prison. I did read that with Kristen & Stefan trying to get EJ removed from the family HDQRS ends up backfiring on them, is that still in play? The reason for my hypothesis is because of this, if the bros DiMera ended up in prison, they wouldn’t have played out Holly buying the narcotics, she wouldn’t have overdosed & Tate wouldn’t have been in prison & they wouldn’t have Leo to drunkenly show up at the house of Stefano, EJ learning that he never was Jude’s father, now would he. So the question that I have is why should it matter that EJ knew where the drugs were coming from, why should that matter, given that Holly didn’t buy them yet, now did she? So how could EJ have prevented the overdose?
If EJ teamed up with Stefan to stop Clyde before Holli’s overdose, the drugs Holli took may never have reached Salem.
I see what you are saying, but what I’m getting at is that with no love lost between the Brothers DeMira, Stefan would have been able to get rid of EJ by turning states evidence against him, & there wouldn’t be any EJ to learn that the drugs were bought by Holly, & the chain of events that required EJ, would it have led to that?
Stefan approached EJ to get EJ’s involvement to get rid of Clyde was December 25, 2023. This event occurred before Holly’s overdose. which was the week after Stefan’s request to EJ to help against Clyde was before Holly’s overdose. so EJ found out about Stefan’s involvement before Holly’s overdose. So I bring it up yet again, I see what you are saying, what I’m getting at is that with no love lost between the brothers DeMira, Stefan would have been able to get rid of EJ by turning states evidence against him & EJ wouldn’t have been present to learn that the narcotics were bought by Holly & the chain of events that required EJ, would it have led to that?
I blame the lack of logic on the interim writers. I’m not sure of the exact date the real writers return, but it is this month and I can’t wait.
So the question that I have is this: Do you really think that it matters that EJ knew where the drugs were coming from before Holly had bought them, given that no one put a gun to Holly’s head to buy them, much yet, to overdose on for that matter. What I’m getting at is that no matter if you are a teenager or not or having a teenage mindset, they should held accountable for their actions, not who had done what before she acted on hers. You can’t focus on other people’s actions when your actions are caused by you, you don’t just don’t get a slap on the wrist & give her phone back to her, you don’t just let it go. Little Miss Holly knew what her mother went through when she thought she lost her son, & yet she had no problem in letting her mother to go through that twice, in an attempt to do away with herself, RIGHT???????????WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To me Holly needs to have the fear of GOD to be handed to her. The same with Tate. He may be a teenager & has the teenage mindset, all he cares about know is having Holly’s legs over his shoulders than what she put him through. He too needs to have the fear of God to be riddle into him. I just don’t understand as to why they aren’t playing up that suspense & intrigue. I really hope that Brady & Theresa sue both Mother & Daughter for allowing their son to go through hell all because Holly’s actions & they better not cave in to what their son wants, meaning, giving them a grandchild, given that they are only focusing him on being a horn-dog, the way they ae depicting Alex, as of now, right?
I think Stefan was too worried about what Clyde would do to Gabi if he turned against Clyde. If Stefan and EJ the DA, teamed up against Clyde it would have carried more weight and perhaps could have moved Gabi somewhere safe.
But if Stefan had went to top-cop-bro-in-law & told him everything as to what Stefan had feared, instead of going to EJ to help Gabi, Gabi would have been moved in to a Luxury prison in New Zealand where she would have access to Ari, everything would have taken care of itself, so this is on Stefan because he allowed Gabi’s life to be threatened & assaulted because he didn’t go to Rafe, now did he? So you tell me as to why EJ should do & allow Stefan to use this against EJ i.e. prevented Holly’s OD.?
Just a beef of mine with the Gabi storyline, she was never convicted of Li’s murder. How has she been in prison this whole time?
It doesn’t matter that Gabi was never convicted of Li’s murder, much less does it matter how long she’s been in prison for it, what matters is that what better way to protect his wife from Clyde is by going to his top-cop-bro-in-law & explain to him everything & have Rafe to have Sonny & Will to go to any Zealander Airport & have Gabi in their protective custody, she would help them take care of Ari, together, now couldn’t they?
That makes sense and the current writers haven’t written anything that makes sense. The whole Nicole gives birth on the side of the road and gives her baby to Dimitri is proof.
Looks like Gil’s black book with the blood on it is going to offer a clue as to who killed Li. My guess the blood is Li’s and Gil killed him. This could get Gabi out of prison.
This week EJ was on the phone with Dr Rolf to get his DNA test results fast. Could this be Dr Rolf coming back into the story because he saved Li and has him on ice in a lab somewhere?
I’m not buying that Gil Carter killed Li Shin because of this: Not once did they ever play up at all that Li posed a threat to him & plus, Gil certainly wouldn’t have had Li’s death to be pinned on Gabi, now would he? Then this, remember, his target was Ava, not Gabi, not Li. right? I don’t think that for one minute that Rolf has Li on ice somewhere, given that Rolf was in the position to team up with Gabi & Stefan to get Li’s shares & that Gil Carter was never even apart of that now was he, much less being in on Li putting it out there that the his shares were phoney, right?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.